3 min to read
Understanding Web Rendering Methods - CSR, SSR, SSG, and ISR
A comprehensive comparison of different web rendering approaches
🎯 Overview
Web rendering is the process of generating visual content from web code, including HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Let’s explore the four main rendering approaches: CSR, SSR, SSG, and ISR.
💻 Client-Side Rendering (CSR)
Process:
- Browser downloads minimal HTML
- JavaScript loads and executes
- UI renders dynamically
- Handles user interactions
Advantages
- Rich interactivity
- Reduced server load
- Fast subsequent navigation
Disadvantages
- Slow initial load
- Poor SEO performance
- JavaScript dependency
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Browser
participant Server
participant API
User->>Browser: 🌐 Request Page
Browser->>Server: 📡 Load Static HTML/JS
Server-->>Browser: 📦 HTML/JS Bundle
Browser->>API: 🔄 Fetch Data (AJAX/Fetch)
API-->>Browser: 📊 JSON Data
Browser->>User: 🖥️ Rendered Content
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering (SSR)
Process:
- Server processes request
- Generates complete HTML
- Sends rendered page
- Browser displays content
Advantages
- Fast initial page load
- SEO friendly
- Consistent performance
Disadvantages
- Higher server load
- Slower page transitions
- More server resources needed
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Browser
participant Server
participant Database
User->>Browser: 🌐 Request Page
Browser->>Server: 📡 Request HTML
Server->>Database: 📂 Fetch Data
Database-->>Server: 📦 Return Data
Server->>Browser: 🏗️ Rendered HTML
Browser->>User: 🖥️ Display Page
📄 Static Site Generation (SSG)
Process:
- Pages built at build time
- Pre-renders all HTML/CSS/JS
- Serves via CDN
- Instant page loads
Advantages
- Extremely fast loading
- Great SEO
- Highly scalable
- Low server costs
Disadvantages
- Long build times
- Limited dynamic content
- Requires full rebuild for updates
graph LR
A[🛠️ Build Time] --> B[📂 Fetch Data]
B --> C[🏗️ Generate Static Pages]
C --> D[🗄️ Store on CDN]
D --> E[🌐 User Requests Page]
E --> F[🚀 Serve Pre-built Page]
🔄 Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR)
Process:
- Initial static generation
- Background revalidation
- Selective page updates
- Cached delivery
Advantages
- Dynamic content updates
- Fast initial loads
- Scalable architecture
- Reduced build times
Disadvantages
- Implementation complexity
- Potential stale content
- Cache management needed
graph LR
A[🌐 User Requests Page] --> B{🗂️ Is Page Cached?}
B -- Yes --> C[📄 Serve Cached Page]
B -- No --> D[📡 Fetch Data from API]
D --> E[📝 Generate Static Page]
E --> F[🗄️ Cache the Page]
F --> C
📊 Rendering Methods Comparison
🔑 Feature | ⚡ CSR | 🌐 SSR | 🏗️ SSG | 🚀 ISR |
---|---|---|---|---|
⏳ Initial Load | 🐢 Slow | ⚡ Fast | 🚀 Fastest | ⚡ Fast |
🔍 SEO | ❌ Poor | ✅ Good | 🌟 Excellent | ✅ Good |
🔄 Dynamic Content | 🌟 Excellent | ✅ Good | ❌ Poor | ✅ Good |
🖥️ Server Load | 🟢 Low | 🔴 High | 🟢 Lowest | 🟡 Medium |
🛠️ Build Time | ⏳ N/A | ⏳ N/A | ⌛ Long | ⏳ Medium |
📌 Use Cases Table
🔑 Feature | ⚡ CSR | 🌐 SSR | 🏗️ SSG | 🚀 ISR |
---|---|---|---|---|
📦 Use Case | SPA (Single Page Application), Dashboards | News websites, e-commerce product pages | Blogs, Documentation sites | E-commerce product pages with frequent updates |
🛠️ Tools/Frameworks | React, Angular, Vue | Next.js, Nuxt.js | Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll | Next.js (ISR), Nuxt 3 |
🔐 Security | Exposed API keys risk | Better control over data flow | Safe with minimal server interaction | Cache invalidation risks |
Comments